Attorneys keep getting in trouble for submitting filings with AI-generated ‘hallucinations.’ Attorneys keep getting in trouble for submitting filings with AI-generated ‘hallucinations.

The lawyers blamed AI tools, including ChatGPT, for errors such as including non-existent quotes from other cases.

A Utah lawyer ... the bogus case. The case referenced, according to documents, was 'Royer v. Nelson' which did not exist in any legal database and was found to be made up by ChatGPT.

Attorneys are facing scorn and sanctions for submitting court filings that contain errors from generative AI-produced ...

The High Court of England and Wales warned lawyers that they could face sanctions for citing fake AI-generated cases without ...

Last month, a recent law school graduate lost his job after using ChatGPT to help draft a court filing that ended up being ...

Facepalm: There has been yet another case of a lawyer ... citations and even quotations to at least one case that does not appear to exist in any legal database (and could only be found in ChatGPT ...

He argued that filing court documents without checking the veracity of citations is “the classic definition of malpractice.” Legal ... research from ChatGPT in a court motion. Lindell’s ...

HUNTSVILLE, Ala. (WHNT) — Attorneys for a Huntsville law firm working for the state of Alabama admitted in federal court Monday that one of their firm partners used ChatGPT to find case ...